Crime and Punishment
"Justice,
only justice shall you pursue" -- Deut. 16:20
There is a humorous story about
the person who killed his parents. Then
he begged for mercy on the grounds that he was an orphan. This little tale raises the essential
questions of the purpose and application of justice.
What is the purpose of
justice? Is it for the well-being of the
community? Or, is it for the well-being
of the individual? If it is for the
community, then it should provide the greatest protection for the
community. If it is for the individual,
then it should seek the greatest compassion for the accused.
In previous posts, we have
examined the role of the individual. However,
we discovered that, in order to maintain the principles of balance and
connection, the individual must be viewed in terms of his/her interaction with
others. The balanced, or responsible,
person must have self-respect and respect for others. Cain's lack of respect led to the death of
Abel. Then, responsibility ensures the
well-being of each individual.
In a society, each person is
connected to the other members. Then
each person's action can threaten the well-being and safety of the community. The metaphysical principle of connection
implies that if one person violates the social contract, the entire community
will suffer from the consequences. Then
the goal of justice is to restore the well-being and safety of the entire
society. Furthermore, the success of any
justice system can be measure by the outcomes it produces.
In the Bible, the Sinai Covenant
is the social contract. Any violation of
the social contract is an offense against the entire society. Then it is the responsibility of the
community to respond. That response must
reflect the principal of balance. In
this case, the balance must be between strict judgment and compassion. The community must measure the degree of the
threat. Then it must determine the
appropriate reaction to a specific individual's action. That reaction must require restitution from
the offender that will restore balance to the society.
Justice requires balance between
strict judgment and compassion. Either,
carried to an extreme, can produce an evil outcome. Strict judgment taken to the extreme becomes
vengeance. Vengeance breeds more
vengeance. Compassion taken to the
extreme encourages repetition of the offence.
In either case, balance cannot be restored. This explains why the balance scales have
been the symbol of justice since ancient Egypt.
Within this context, how must a
just society deal with those who choose to violate the contract? One way is restitution another is
removal. For example, if the offense was
stealing, then the offender must restore the stolen object to its owner and pay
a penalty for any loss incurred because of the absence of the stolen
property. If the object is no longer
available, then the offender must pay for the total loss or provide services to
the owner that represents the value of the loss. It is important to recognize that restitution
must go to the victim. The balance of
the community is achieved through the restoration of balance between the
parties involved.
If the crime was murder, there is
no way to restore the victim to the society.
In that case, the only restitution available is the life of the
offender. The sixth commandment
correctly reads, "Don't murder".
It does not say don't
kill. It recognizes that there are times
that killing is unintended or justifiable.
Now, let's return to the case of
the "orphaned" offender. The
matter must focus on the protection of the society. Clearly, in this case, his status of
"orphan" is irrelevant. He was
the means that led to his being "orphaned". The only relevant issue is will the safety of
the community be restored after his case is adjudicated. If he murdered because he wanted to turn a
video game into reality, then he will likely continue to be a threat to
society. He must then be removed from
society.
On the other hand, what if his
parents had become an immediate threat to his life and he saw no other way
out? The balance might be restored in a
way that will benefit the community. For
example, with proper supervision and training he might commit his life to
assisting others in a similar situation to find another way out. Notice, in this scenario he still must make
restitution with his life by benefitting the society (strict judgment). At the same time, he is given the opportunity
to live (compassion).
True justice is the highest form
of respect for all people in a society.
Those who choose to keep their contract are respected for who they are -
contributors to the community. And,
those who choose to violate their contract are respected for who they are -
threats to the community.
No comments:
Post a Comment